Unisource - k49924

Kingman Daily Miner | Kingman, Arizona Home | Classifieds | Public Notices | Galleries | Opinions | Obituaries | Contact Us | Subscribe | E-Alerts | RSS



home : latest news : latest news July 29, 2010


7/14/2009 6:00:00 AM
Gould lauded for opposing cap and trade
Americans for Prosperity also praise Franks for signing pledge

Suzanne Adams
Miner Staff Reporter


KINGMAN - At least three state representatives have voiced their opposition to a cap and trade bill moving through Congress. The measure recently passed the U.S. House and is currently working its way through the U.S. Senate.

According to Americans for Prosperity, Arizona Sen. Ron Gould and U.S. Rep. Trent Franks have signed a pledge against the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. And Rep. Nancy McLain can also be counted among the global warming skeptics, though she was not cited for signing the pledge.

According to GovTrack.us, the act is a conglomeration of changes to energy rules and regulations governing air pollution from and the efficiency of vehicles, industry, appliances and energy providers.

GovTrack.us is an independent Web site that tracks federal legislation and the voting records and statements of congressmen.

The most contested point of the bill proposes the capping of certain air pollutants, including carbon dioxide, and the allocation and trade of pollution credits among industry.

Supporters of the bill say it would reduce the amount of greenhouse gases and pollutants in the air and give energy providers a stronger incentive to move toward renewable energy resources.

McLain doesn't believe global warming is a man-made phenomenon. She believes it is just part of the natural warming and cooling cycle of the planet.

"I think it's a fraud perpetrated on the American people," she said.

McLain has not signed the pledge.

"Now should we reduce carbon emissions to prevent smog, sure," she said. "But we do not want to destroy businesses on a false premise."

Opponents of the bill, such as Gould, say that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant and that cap and trade bills are actually a tax on industry and its customers.

"I think cap and trade is a bad idea," Gould said. "It's really more of a cap and tax."

It also makes for a good investment scam, Gould said.

If the bill passes, industry that falls under its regulation will be able to apply for credits that will allow it to exceed the pollution limits imposed by the federal government. Some of those credits can be traded on the stock market or to other industries looking for more credits.

Gould was also concerned about language in the bill that would expand the cap and trade program and allow the pollution credits to be traded internationally.

"The U.S. could be subsidizing industry in Mexico," he said.

According to GovTrack.us, the bill would also provide rebates for low-income residents to help with possible increases in the cost of energy to the consumer. The bill also offers rebates for consumers who buy energy efficient appliances.

That increase would far outweigh any help the federal government would provide, Gould said. He also raised concerns that the bill would require homeowners to retrofit their homes to make them more energy efficient before being able to sell them.

According to GovTrack.us, the bill does have language that would require remodeled and new buildings to meet higher energy efficiency standards, but did not appear to have anything governing the sale of older homes.

A summary of the bill can be found at www.GovTrack.us. A list of congressmen, state legislators, mayors, governors and others who have signed the pledge against the bill can be found at www.noclimatetax.com.



Mission Bank


Reader Comments

Posted: Thursday, July 16, 2009
Article comment by: Helen

The ice caps melted once before, was that global warming due to mankind? I am also a skeptic of existing global warming advocates, and I am a democrat.

Posted: Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Article comment by: Wendy

It is our duty as human beings to protect our earth. Any bill aimed at doing that is a bill worth supporting

Posted: Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Article comment by: Daryl

Cap and trade is all about controlling you.Think about it.As you read more about it you will come to the same conclusion.

Posted: Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Article comment by: cap and wait for the bill

you are not going to believe your electric bill in another ten or so years.. better start saving for it now and don't even think about retirement unless you have a solar air conditioning unit!!!!

Posted: Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Article comment by: Pandoras Box

I agree, it would just turn into a fraud, giving credits that can be traded on the market? If you want to do something to help, then do it, but don't put in caps that can be exceeded, if you have enough money. I'm not saying that it doesn't exist, but this is just pandoras box waiting to be exploited, at the cost of what? At the cost that in 10 years you'll find out that it was all a fraud.

Posted: Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Article comment by: Bart

Yep, Global Warming in nothing but a myth. That's why its a comfortable 80 degrees in Kingman on July 14th, oh wait...

Posted: Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Article comment by: Dave in Golden Valley

Unicorns are real creatures too, Nancy. The ice is not melting on glaciers throughout the world, the sea is not rising, and you are in accord with your compadre in Snowflake, as the earth is only 6,000 years old. Global warming is not hardly debated other than by neanderthals in the Arizona legislature. Cap and trade is a legitimate policy issue to debate, the science is not. Maybe the earth started on the 23rd of October 4004 BC at 9:00Am.

Posted: Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Article comment by: FreedomLover

Thank God for Ron Gould.

Posted: Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Article comment by: LeftiesRSmarter

There is no legitimate scientific debate over whether global warming exists or whether humans contribute to it. The only people who deny it are conservatives and a handful of discredited former scientists who are paid by conservative think tanks. Opposing cap and trade is a legitimate position but when our reps deny global warming they prove themselves to be woefully misinformed. Perhaps they also believe Michael Jackson is still alive and with Elvis.

Posted: Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Article comment by: Another Obama BS Bill

Americans for Prosperity also praise Franks for signing pledge

KINGMAN - At least three state representatives have voiced their opposition to a cap and trade bill moving through Congress. The measure recently passed the U.S. House and is currently working its way through the U.S. Senate.

According to Americans for Prosperity, Arizona Sen. Ron Gould and U.S. Rep. Trent Franks have signed a pledge against the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. And Rep. Nancy McLain can also be counted among the global warming skeptics, though she was not cited for signing the pledge.

Good ! That dumb senate bill is BS and if inacted will cost every American lots of wasted money .



Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments. Article comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to the Use of Service section in our Terms of Use agreement. The email address and phone number you provide are for internal use and will not be visible to the public. The passcode below is not case-sensitive.
You may post comments using a pseudonym or alias name and enter 000-0000 for the phone number.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Phone:
Required
Email:
Required
Message:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search

    Recently Commented     Most Viewed
•  Letter: President Obama must be impeached (24 comments)

•  Judge will have to decide dispute over Chihuahuas (41 comments)

•  Fired police officer fights for his job (6 comments)

•  Column: The 'service' of slavery (4 comments)

•  Letter: Obama reversing recession train (9 comments)






Reader Poll
Reader Poll

• Click here to comment on this question

• Click here to see previous poll results

The Kingman City Council is considering changing its standard meeting day and time from 6 p.m. every first and third Monday. Which day and time would you prefer?

Please select one:

6 p.m. Monday (current)
5:30 p.m. Monday
6 p.m. Tuesday
5:30 p.m. Tuesday
Some other day
Some other time
Some other day and time

View Results


Find it Features Blogs Milestones Extras Submit Other Publications Local Listings
Home | Galleries | Opinions | Obituaries | Contact Us | Subscribe | E-Alerts | RSS | Site Map
Kids Little Smiles

© Copyright 2010 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Kingman Daily Miner is the information source for Kingman and surrounding area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Kingman Daily Miner Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to email your questions, comments or suggestions. Kingman Daily Miner Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info, Inc.® All Rights Reserved.


Software © 1998-2010 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved